The Democratic City Committee List

My sense is that the Democratic City Committee is fairly corrupt, and the recommendation goes to the highest bidder. Many have thrown out the number $35,000 as what it takes as a minimum to be recommended. This gets you support from the ward leaders and on the sample ballots that will be handed out in front of polling stations. I suppose it’s useful to know which campaigns were able to raise the money, and to know who will be on the sample ballot, but I wouldn’t really take this list with more than a grain of salt. The party has often endorsed candidates that, when elected judge, have proven to be inexperienced and ineffective.

Ken Powell is a glaring example as a known republican. He has cross-filed, as many republicans do, in order to get elected before. How a republican gets the committee’s recommendation over other candidates is awfully curious to me. Luckily, he has agreed to an interview, and I’ll be able to ask him soon.

The Committee also tends to try to have an evenly split ballot–take a look at how many minorities and women are on the list, and you’ll see what I mean. I support women and minority candidates for their ability to understand some things in ways that white males never can, but I don’t think that makes them uniquely qualified to be a judge.

Finally, I have heard more than one person say, “The Committee like to pick winners.” Take a look at ballot positions, and draw your own conclusions.

Common Pleas:

  1.  Scott DiClaudio
  2.  Ken Powell
  3.  Tracy Roman
  4.  Lyris Young
  5.  Daine Grey
  6.  Abbe Fletman
  7.  Kai Scott
  8.  Mia Roberts-Perez
  9.  Michael Fanning
  10. Vincent Melchiorre
  11. Chris Mallios
  12. Stephanie Sawyer

Municipal Court:

  1. Sharon Williams Losier
  2. Joffie Pittman
  3. Christine Hope

The Bar List

The Bar list is one of the more respected ones. They released a partial list of candidates whom they’ve already considered, and plan to release more forthcoming.

There is some disagreement as to how political the decisions are–whether someone with money, or who volunteers with the Bar, or who has influential connections can get recommended over others. There is also a general rule that anyone with under 10 years of experience doesn’t get recommended. The process is rather hidden from view. Candidates fill out a questionnaire, which usually, but not always, remains confidential. They are interviewed by a panel of lawyers. Sometimes other people in the field who may know the candidate are questioned about their candidacy. None of the process or why a decision is reached is made public. This leaves room for candidates to speculate or make claims as to why they were or were not recommended.

I would take this list into consideration when voting, but with an eyebrow raised. If there’s someone you like who wasn’t recommended, maybe give it a second thought. If there’s someone recommended, even highly, whom you don’t like, trust your gut.

Recommendations are based on:

  • Legal ability sufficient to have earned the respect of lawyers and members of the bench.
  • Trial or other experience which ensures knowledge of the rules of evidence and courtroom procedures.
  • A record and reputation for excellent character and integrity.
  • Financial Responsibility.
  • Judicial temperament.
  • Mental and physical capacity sufficient to discharge fully the duties of judicial office.
  • Record of Community Involvement
  • Administrative Ability
  • Devotion to improvement of the quality of justice.
  • Demonstrated sound judgment in one’s professional life.

Common Pleas:

  1. Abbe F. Fletman Highly Recommended
  2. Christopher Peter Mallios, Jr. Highly Recommended
  3. Kai N. Scott Highly Recommended
  4. James F. Berardinelli Recommended
  5. Lucretia Clemons Recommended
  6. James C. Crumlish, III Recommended
  7. Michael Fanning Recommended
  8. Vincent Giusini Recommended
  9. Daine A. Grey, Jr. Recommended
  10. Anthony George Kyriakakis Recommended
  11. Thomas Martin Recommended
  12. Christopher I. McCabe Recommended
  13. Vincent Melchiorre Recommended
  14. Brian T. Ortelere Recommended
  15. Ourania Papademetriou Recommended
  16. Kenneth James Powell, Jr. Recommended
  17. Stella Ming Tsai Recommended
  18. Betsy Jo Wahl Recommended
  19. Franklin A. Bennett, III Not Recommended
  20. Deborah D. Cianfrani Not Recommended
  21. Scott DiClaudio Not Recommended
  22. Vincent W. Furlong Not Recommended
  23. Sharon Williams Losier Not Recommended
  24. Edward W. Louden, Jr. Not Recommended
  25. Jon Marshall Not Recommended
  26. Tracy Brandeis Roman Not Recommended
  27. Zachary C. Shaffer Not Recommended
  28. Dawn M. Tancredi Not Recommended

About Me

Lizzie Burrows

profile

A concerned citizen like my readers, I wanted to put these and future elections of our judiciary back into the hands of the people by providing information, interviews, and opinions about those running for judicial offices. I can be reached at lizzie.burrows@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: the views presented in my blog are mine and mine alone, unless presented in quotation marks. They do not reflect any organization that I am part of, including the Defender Association of Philadelphia, nor any of my friends or contacts. I am fully capable of forming my own conclusions, and I encourage my readers to do the same.

*Sorry to those who’ve been wondering about me. I thought that my Gravatar public profile would appear on my website, since that’s how wordpress handles bios, but I can’t seem to make that work.

My Picks for Common Pleas – A First Draft

My hope is that over the course of the next two months, this list may change drastically. I wanted to do a first draft to see how having more information changes my vote.

Whom I leaned toward in choosing a Judge:

1. Someone with a criminal defense background. 67 of the 90 judges in Common Pleas Court deal with criminal law. Also, the consequences being more dire than matters of money or arguably, custody, I want judges who know criminal matters well. I lean toward defenders rather than prosecutors as I think which law one chooses to practice may reflect one’s world view. I want judges who are more focused on making sure the trial is fair than making sure punishment is served. This bias may well change.

2. Someone for the people. My religious tradition teaches that to judge fairly, one must not be partial to the poor nor give preference to the rich. I hold that to be important, but I want judges who can acknowledge how the system is stacked against the poor, and who dream of a justice system that could be restorative and rehabilitative rather than punitive.

3. Have a website. This is 2015. Not having a website is basically not being in the race.

There are 12 Common Pleas seats open. Here are my picks in no particular order.

1. Daine Grey

daine grey

Grey has over 15 years of defense experience, as well as medical malpractice defense. He volunteers with city youth.

2. Josh Hill

Hill has criminal defense and medical malpractice defense experience, and clerked for a Common Pleas Judge. He volunteers his services to The Support Center for Child Advocates.

3. Chris Mallios

Highly recommended by the Philadelphia Bar Association, Mallios is an extremely impressive candidate. Mallios has worked for the District Attorney (specializing in rape, child abuse, hate crimes, and domestic violence) as well as been court-appointed defense, and has taught at local universities and institutions and given trainings abroad.

4. Mia Roberts-Perez

Perez, whose website is in English and Spanish, has her own practice in criminal and family law, and teaches at Temple.

5. Kai Scott

Scott (on the left) has been a public defender for Philadelphia and at the federal level, where she has served as chief of the trial unit. She volunteers coaching high school mock trial teams.

6. Wayne Bennett

Famous for his blog, Field Negro, Bennett is an extremely radical candidate. I’m not sure what kind of law he practices, though he has been a family court judge.

7. James Berardinelli

Berardinelli has been on both sides of homicide and special victims cases, first for 17 years as a prosecutor, and now as defense.

8. Abbe Fletman

Judge Fletman’s background is in complex commercial disputes such as intellectual property matters. She seems to be very active with the Bar Association, which highly recommended her, and as a volunteer of pro bono legal services.

9. Vince Melchiorre

Judge Melchiorre has heard felony waiver cases in the Southwest zone since January, and has been competent and fair. His prior practice concentrated on personal injury, commercial, and real estate legislation. He volunteers as a karate instructor.

10. Zac Shaffer

Honorably, Shaffer refuses to take campaign contributions in order to remain impartial to the utmost degree. He seems to rest not on his laurels of experience so much as a platform of ideas and beliefs–ones that I can get behind. His website is very snazzy.

11. Stella Tsai

There’s something about Tsai that’s extremely likeable. She has done products liability litigation, civil RICO and securities fraud matters, prepared decisions and presided over hearings for the City of Philadelphia Civil Service Commission, represented insurance companies in disputes with corporate policyholders over coverage for environmental and bodily injury claims, and counseled business organizations on corporate ethics and governance matters.

12. Betsy Wahl

Wahl is a Master in Juvenile Delinquency Court, mediating family matters, and advocating for juvenile justice. She has also taught criminal law at Temple and Cabrini.